Staff Reporter / New Delhi
Communist Party of India CPI has demands a full bench of Supreme Court review of the Supreme Court judgment upholding 10 per cent reservation for EWS category.
It said that the Supreme Court judgment upholding 10 per cent reservation for EWS category by a five-member bench with three upholding and two expressing dissent has raised several questions regarding the very policy of reservations.
“Pertinent questions about the judgment’s impact on reservation for SC/ST/OBC, in the absence of caste census, non-availability of data and criteria to determine the economically weaker sections of forward castes, etc. have come to the fore”, Party said in a statment .
The judgment has created apprehensions with several political parties and social movements demanding that the judgment be referred to a larger constitution bench of the Supreme Court for clarification and constitutional merit of the judgment.
It added that CPI is relentlessly fighting for a casteless and classless society and stands for equality, social justice and annihilation of caste.
“The legislative intent behind reservation was not poverty alleviation but affirmative action for historically discriminated and deprived sections of our society” , party said.
At a time when privatization is being aggressively pursued by the present government, our fight for reservation in private sector must continue with even greater strength, party stressed.
Tamil Nadu’s political parties to file a review petition against the EWS verdict
Syed Ali Mujtaba
Chennai: Thol Thirumavalavan leader of Tamil Nadu’s political party Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) has said his party will file a review petition against the Supreme Court verdict on 10 percent quota for Economically Weaker Section (EWS) among the forward caste.
The Apex Court upheld the 10% EWS quota by a 3-2 verdict stating that it does not violate the basic structure of the Constitution. While Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, Bela M Trivedi, and J B Pardiwala agreed that the amendment does not violate the basic structure of the Constitution, Chief Justice of India U U Lalit and Justice S Ravindra Bhat disagreed.
Justice S Ravindra Bhat, along with Chief Justice U U Lalit, dissented with a majority view that upheld the validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019 and said EWS quota sanctioned avowedly exclusionary, discriminatory principle
Commenting on the SC judgment, VCK supremo Thirumavalavan said ‘the issue of the reservation has to be resolved in the political space and not by the judiciary. He further said economic status cannot be taken as an indicator of social justice.
“We appeal to everyone to fight the BJP government’s EWS quota which is against OBC people, who form the majority of Hindus. We also appeal to Congress and Left parties to change their stance and oppose the EWS quota,” Thirumavalavan said.
Other Political parties, including the ruling DMK, PMK, and AMMK led by AIADMK rebel T T V Dhinakaran also termed the SC judgment as a “setback” to the state’s century-old fight for social justice.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K Stalin recalled that it was the DMK that paved the way for the first constitutional amendment to safeguard social justice. ‘It is DMK which is leading the legal battle against the EWS quota introduced by BJP-led Union Government in 2019’ Stalin said and appealed to like-minded parties to unite and raise voices against the SC verdict.
MLA Udainidhi Stalin, leader of the DMK Youth Wing termed the SC judgment as an obstacle for the people who progress with the help of social justice. The SC judgment is “injustice delivered to the BC/SC/STs in the country, he said.
AIADMK rebel T T V Dhinakaran asked Chief Minister M K Stalin to ensure that the 69 percent reservation remains “untouched,” in Tamil Nadu
Anbumani Ramadoss PMK Chief and former Union Health Minister said the SC verdict was against the “principles” of social justice being followed in the country. “India is a country which has an unequal society. To ensure equality, reservation should be provided on the basis of social status, not economic status. People’s economic status changes from time to time and reservations based on economic status will at best be a poverty alleviation programme. It will never ensure social justice,” he said.
However, the principal opposition party, AIADMK, did not comment on the issue. So did Congress and the Left parties which supported the EWS quota when it was introduced in Parliament in 2019.
The broad consensus among political parties in Tamil Nadu is the EWS quota is unjust as economic status can’t be the indicator for providing reservation. They appealed to everyone should come together and fight against such unjust judgment.
—