AGENCIES / NEW DELHI
Acknowledging the right of farmers to non-violent protests, Supreme Court today asked the Centre to consider putting the farm reform laws on hold and postponed the hearing. The apex court also suggested forming a committee to resolve the deadlock.
Yesterday, Supreme Court had said the Centre’s negotiations with the farmers “have not worked” and also talked about forming a panel with the farmer groups, government officials and other stakeholders to resolve the deadlock. However, farmer groups were not happy with the suggestion.
Supreme Court also said the farmers’ agitation may soon become a national issue unless resolved now. Meanwhile, a Sikh preacher shot himself at the Singhu border protest, leaving behind a suicide note in which he said he has killed himself in solidarity with the ongoing farmers’ protest.
The apex court, which made it clear that the issue of farmers’ protest and the right to move freely of others would be dealt on priority and not the validity of laws at the moment, also said it was thinking of setting up an “impartial and independent” panel of agriculture experts and farmer unions to resolve the impasse.
The top court said it was of the view that the farmers’ right to protest should not infringe the fundamental rights of others to move freely and in getting essential food and other supplies as right to protest cannot mean blockade of the entire city. The apex court, which said it was worried with the way things are going on, was told by both the Centre and one of the farmers union that the negotiations are not happening at the moment. It also said farmers cannot keep on protesting without talking to the government. You continue the protest. You have the right. But you have a purpose also and that purpose is served only if you talk, discuss and reach a conclusion, a bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde said but added that in a democracy, police and authorities have to be given power to prevent the protestors from infringing the rights of others.
The bench said it would pass order on constituting a committee only after hearing all the parties including the protesting farmer unions and putting on hold the implementation of new agri laws by the Centre would enable negotiations with farmers. However, Attorney General K K Venugopal opposed the suggestion and said if the implementation of the farm laws are put on hold then farmers would not come forward for negotiations.
The top court said it was not asking the Centre to stay the farm laws but only suggesting that its implementation be put on hold for the time being to enable the farmers to talk with the government. We are worried about the plight of farmers. We are also Indian but we are worried with the way things are going on, the bench, also comprising Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, said and added they (protesting farmers) are not a mob.
The top court said it will pass orders for serving notices to the protesting farmer unions and give them the liberty to approach the vacation bench during the winter break. During the hearing conducted through video-conferencing, the bench observed that it recognises the farmers’ right to protest but this right should not infringe the fundamental rights of others to move freely and in getting essential food and other supplies.
Maintaining that in a democracy, police and authorities have to be given power to prevent the protestors from infringing the rights of others, the bench said “Who will take guarantee that if farmers are allowed to enter the city in such high numbers, they will not resort to violence? “Court cannot guarantee this.