By A Correspondent / NEW DELHI
In House panel probing the allegations of sexual harassment against Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi has given him a clean chit in the case. The accusations against the chief justice were levelled by a former woman employee of the Supreme Court.
The three-member panel headed by Justice SA Bobde said in its report that it had found no substance in the allegations contained in the complaint made by the woman against Gogoi.
“The in-house inquiry committee has found no substance in the allegations in the complaint dated April 19 of a former employee of the Supreme Court,” the Supreme Court said in a statement.
The panel, which includes Justice SA Bobde, Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Indu Malhotra, also said the report of a committee was “not liable to be made public”. This means the inquiry report will not be shared with the complainant.
The Chief Justice appeared on Wednesday before the panel, which continued the inquiry even after the complainant opted out. The woman withdrew from the inquiry on Tuesday, saying she felt she was “not likely to get justice from this committee”.
JUST IN: In-house inquiry committee headed by Justice S A Bobde finds no substance in the allegations of sexual harassment made by ex-employee of the Supreme Court against the CJI Ranjan Gogoi.
In-house inquiry report not to be made public. pic.twitter.com/gzqUjfIsVL
— The Leaflet (@TheLeaflet_in) May 6, 2019
Chief Justice Sex Harassment Allegations: The Supreme Court in-house inquiry panel, which includes Justice SA Bobde, Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Indu Malhotra, has said that the report of a committee constituted as part of the in-house inquiry is “not liable to be made public”
In a letter, she said she found the “atmosphere of the committee very frightening” and that she felt “very nervous” as she was not allowed to bring her lawyer or discuss the proceedings with her.
The panel’s composition was tweaked after her objections that one of the judges was a close family friend of the Chief Justice.
Justice NV Ramana immediately withdrew from the panel, saying while he rejected her aspersions on his “capacity to render impartial judgment”, it was essential that justice “must not only be done, but also manifestly seem to be done”.
Soon after the allegation surfaced last month, Chief Justice Gogoi, at a special hearing of the top court, denied the woman’s claims and said he was being targeted as he was to hear several important cases.